Muhammed Sharif v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala examined an application for pre-arrest anticipatory bail. The court distinguished the roles of the accused, finding Accused No.2 likely used a dangerous weapon requiring interrogation, thus denying his bail. Bail was partially allowed for Accused Nos.1 and 3 with conditions to surrender within two weeks.
What did the court decide?
Bail granted to Accused Nos.1 and 3 subject to surrender within two weeks and payment of bond with sureties; bail denied to Accused No.2.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK MENON
TUESDAY, THE 01ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2020 / 10TH AGRAHAYANA, 1942
Bail Appl..No.7293 OF 2020
CRIME NO.1092/2020 OF Vadakara Police Station , Kozhikode
PETITIONER/S:
1 MUHAMMED SHARIF AGED 30 YEARS KIZHAKKAYIL MEETHAL, CHAMMARATHUR, VATAKARA P.O. 673101
2 SHAMIN O.M. AGED 37 YEARS S/O. IBRAHIM HAJI, OTHAYOTH HOUSE, KEEZHAD, VATAKARA P.O.
3 SHARAFUDHIN AGED 39 YEARS
S/O. YUSUF, KANHIRATHINTAVITA, CHEMMARATHUR, VATAKARA
BY ADV. SRI.S.VINOD BHAT
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to all three accused under Section 438 Cr.P.C. given the gravity of injuries sustained by the complainant and the ambiguity regarding the weapon used.
Whether custodial interrogation is required to identify the alleged dangerous weapon used by Accused No.2.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
MUHAMMED SHARIF
- petitioner
SHAMIN O.M.
- petitioner
SHARAFUDHIN
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA
- respondent
SALIM K
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court