second installment, the unique number of the transaction was passed on by the second accused to the 3rd accused, who in turn intimated the bank. Out of Rs.5 Lakhs transferred on 28/11/2019 to the joint account of the petitioners, a sum of Rs.49,999/- was transferred to the account of 2nd accused and another sum of Rs.49,999/- to the account of 5th accused. Out of the remaining Rs. 4 Lakhs, Rs.2 Lakhs each was withdrawn by the 3rd accused on 29/11/2019 and on 30/11/2019. There is no document to show that the amount of Rs.4 lakhs was handed over by the 3rd accused to the 2nd accused except his own version. However, the records disclose some materials to indicate that A1 and A2 have acknowledged the receipt of Rs. 5 Lakhs from the third accused. Nothing has been unraveled till now to show that the money was personally utilised by the 3rd and 4th accused. The records show that when second instalment of money was not transferred to the account of the petitioners herein, the 2nd accused and 3rd accused went to Co-operative bank. After the secretary revealed that it was the government account, the third accused is stated to have directed that further amounts shall be transferred to the account of 2nd accused. It is also revealed that the third accused persuaded the 2nd accused to return Rs. 5 Lakhs. It is seen that under the directions of second accused, first accused is stated to have raised Rs. 5 Lakhs which the third accused remitted in the bank. Regarding the complicity of the 4th accused, no specific materials are also not forthcoming. The only role attributed to the
