The High Court of Kerala heard an application for anticipatory bail filed by Binu, accused of offences including PC 294, 506, 447, 324, Arms Act 27. The Court dismissed the application, finding it not a fit case for granting bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
THURSDAY, THE 06TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020 / 17TH MAGHA, 1947
Bail Appl..No.143 OF 2020
CRIME NO.710/2019 OF KANJIRAMKULAM POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1:
BINU AGED 35 YEARS S/O.SASIDHARAN, PUTHENVILAKATHU KIZHAKARIL VEEDU, PUNNAKULAM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADV. SRI.SASTHAMANGALAM S. AJITHKUMAR
RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT:
THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682031.
SRI. AMJAD ALI, SR. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06.02.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
2
Bail Appl..No.143 OF 2020
Bail Application No.143 of 2020
O R D E R
This is an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
Bail Appl..No.143 OF 2020
3
Having heard the learned counsel for the parties on either side, I am of the view that this is not a fit case for granting anticipatory bail. In the circumstances, the application for anticipatory bail is dismissed.
Sd/P.B.SURESH KUMAR, JUDGE.
DK
4 provisions across 3 enactments
Binu
The State of Kerala Represented by the Public Prosecutor
P.B. Suresh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
