P.Velayudhan v. the Travancore Sugars and Chemicals Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Appeal Suit was dismissed on the grounds of non-prosecution as no representation appeared for the appellant despite repeated calls.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
TUESDAY, THE 07TH DAY OF JANUARY 2020 / 17TH POUSHA, 1941
AS.No.612 OF 1999(C)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OS 84/1995 DATED 07-09-1998 OF SUB COURT, THIRUVALLA
APPELLANT/DEFENDANT:
P.VELAYUDHAN PROPRIETOR, M/S.SHOBA BOTTLES, 1/159, KUNNAMPURAM, KALPATHI, PALAKKAD – 678 003.
BY ADVS. SRI.V.V.SIDHARTHAN (SR.) SRI.T.K.SHAJAHAN
RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF:
THE TRAVANCORE SUGARS AND CHEMICALS LTD. VALANJAVATTOM THIRUVALLA TALUK REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER
R1 BY ADV. N.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR BY ORDER R1 BY ADV. SRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR R1 BY ADV. SRI.K.JOHN MATHAI R1 BY ADV. SRI.JOSON MANAVALAN R1 BY ADV. SRI.KURYAN THOMAS R1 BY ADV. SRI.PAULOSE C. ABRAHAM
THIS APPEAL SUITS HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07.01.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
AS.No.612 OF 1999 2
JUDGMENT
Even though this matter was called more
than once today, there was no representation for the appellant. I, therefore, suspect that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting this matter any further. Accordingly, this Appeal Suit is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
JUDGE
MC/8.01.2020
P.VELAYUDHAN PROPRIETOR, M/S.SHOBA BOTTLES
THE TRAVANCORE SUGARS AND CHEMICALS LTD.
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court