Dismissed
Mohammed Shajahan v. the Nedumpram Gramapanchyath
Kerala HCWP(C)/922/2019
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
MONDAY, THE 04TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019 / 15TH MAGHA, 1940
WP(C).No. 922 of 2019
PETITIONER/S:
MOHAMMED SHAJAHAN, AGED 50 YEARS, S/O. MOHAMMED HANEEFA, RESIDING IN PUTHUPATHRACHIRAYIL, NEDUMPURAM P.O., THIRUVALLA, PATHANAMATHITTA DISTRICT 689 578 BY ADV. SRI.PRAMOD J.DEV
RESPONDENT/S:
1 THE NEDUMPRAM GRAMAPANCHYATH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, NEDUMPRAM P.O, THIRUVALLA, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT 689 578 2 THE STANDING COMMITTEE,NEDUMPRAM GRAMAPANCHAYATH, NEDUMPARAM P.O., THIRUVALLA, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT 689 578 3 ANSARI P.O., PUTHUVATHRAYIL, NEDUMPRAM P.O., THIRUVALLA, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT 689 578 4 SHAJI, VALAVIL, NEDUMPRAM P.O., THIRUVALLA, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT 689 578 R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI.V.SAJITH KUMAR, SC, NEDUMPURAM GRAMA PANCHAYAT
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04.02.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 922 of 2019 2
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking the following reliefs:-
“i) a writ of mandamus, or such other writ, direction, or order directing second respondent to consider and take a decision on Exhibit P6 appeal filed by the petitioner as early as possible and at any rate within a time frame to be stipulated by this Hon'ble Court;
ii) such other orders as is prayed for pendente lite and as is deemed fit, just and proper by this Hon'ble Court on the facts and in the circumstances of the case.”
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- SHAJI P.CHALY
JUDGE
uu 04.02.2019
WP(C).No. 922 of 2019 3
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
| EXHIBIT P1 | A TRUE COPY OF TH RECEIPT ISSUED BY VILLAGE OFFICE DA |
E PROPERTY TAX THE NEDUMPRAM TED 14.9.18 |
|---|---|---|
| EXHIBIT P2 | THE TRUE COPY OF RECEIPT ISSUED BY VILLAGE OFFICE DA |
THE PROPERTY TAX THE NEDUMPRAM TED 14.9.18 |
| EXHIBIT P3 | TRUE COPY OF THE SUBMITTED BY THE THE FIRST RESPOND RELINQUISHING THE WIDENING THE ROAD |
APPLICATION PETITIONER BEFORE ENT FOR PROPERTY FOR DATED 15.12.2005 |
| EXHIBIT P4 | TRUE COPY OF THE 4654/18 DATED 4.1 THE FIRST RESPOND |
LETTER NO. BI- 2.2018 ISSUED BY ENT |
| EXHIBIT P5 | TRUE COPY OF THE 4654/18 DATED 20. THE FIRST RESPOND |
LETTER NO. B1- 12.2018 ISSUED BY ENT |
| EXHIBIT P6 | TRUE COPY OF THE THE PETITIONER BE RESPONDENT DATED |
APPEAL SUBMITTED BY FORE THE SECOND 24.12.2018 |
| EXHIBIT P7 |
TRUE COPY OF THE THE SECOND RESPON |
RECEIPT ISSUED BY DENT DATED 24.12.18 |
RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:NIL
//TRUE COPY//
P.A. TO JUDGE
Mohammed Shajahan
The Nedumpram Gramapanchayath
The Standing Committee, Nedumpram Gramapanchayath
Ansari P. O.
Shaji, Valavil
Shaji P Chalhy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court