something which is intrinsically and dynamically associated with literature, culture, art and associated fields, like drama, cinema, music, fine arts etc. Therefore, if the 1st respondent-State Government has permitted the 4th respondent-Library not only to augment library facilities; but also put up a auditorium for related activities of discussion on literary and other issues, it cannot be said that such use of the building put up by the library would be in violation of terms and conditions of the grant. The petitioner in W.P.(C) No.749 of 2019 has mainly admitted that she has property, which is adjacent to the proposed construction and that her property would be substantially affected by the impugned construction. The said petitioner's own tenant has filed a civil suit wherein the averments was not regarding allegations of violations in the terms and conditions of the grant but that the impugned construction would affect the free flow of light and air to his building. One of the petitioners is not even a member of the Library. The other petitioner though initially was a member has not taken steps to renew the membership and has not even cared to take a single book to read and who does not have active membership or voting right in the library. These factual averments in the counter affidavits are not even remotely controverted by the petitioners. In the light of these aspects ,and more particularly in view of the fact that
