The High Court of Kerala dismissed the writ petition as infructuous at the request of the petitioner's counsel, without rendering any detailed reasoning or engaging substantive legal propositions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
&
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN
WEDNESDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF AUGUST 2019 / 23RD SRAVANA, 1941
WP(C).No.5948 OF 2018(P)
PETITIONER:
MINI ANTONY, W/O. ANTONY, AGED 41 YEARS,KONNOTH HOUSE, KADEBHAGOM,H.M.C.ROAD, PALLURUTHY
BY ADVS. SRI.R.KRISHNAKUMAR (CHERTHALA) SRI.JUBYRAJ.A.P
RESPONDENTS:
R1 BY G.P. SMT. RAJI T. BHASKER
R3 ADV. SRI.DINESH MATHEW J.MURICKEN
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 14.08.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No.5948 OF 2018(P)
2
JUDGMENT
K. Vinod Chandran, J.
Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous, at the request of the learned counsel for the
petitioner.
Sd/-
K.VINOD CHANDRAN
JUDGE
Sd/-
V.G.ARUN
JUDGE
kmd
Mini Antony
Circle Inspector of Police, Palluruthy
George
Salin.K.S
K. Vinod Chandran
V.G. Arun
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
