This writ petition challenging directives toward police officials was dismissed by the High Court of Kerala as infructuous, finding no continuing threat to justify relief.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
&
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN
TUESDAY, THE 06TH DAY OF AUGUST 2019 / 15TH SRAVANA, 1941
WP(C).No.3644 OF 2019(E)
PETITIONER/S:
NINAN LUKOSE, AGED 65 YEARS S/O.LUKOSE, VALIYAKARIKKATHIL PUTHEN VEED, MANNUR PO, KADAKKAL, KOTTARAKKARA TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT.
BY ADVS. SRI.N.P.PRADEEP SRI.M.AJITH (KARICODE)
RESPONDENT/S:
W.P.(C) No.3644 of 2019
-2-
VEEDU, (VENGAVILA VEEDU), MANNUR P.O., KOTTARAKKARA TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT-691311.
7 ALEX, S/O.THOMAS, SONI BHAVAN, MANNUR P.O., KOTTARAKKARA TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT-691311.
8 KOMALANGHAN, CHARUVILA PUTHEN VEED, MANNUR PO, KOTTARAKKARA TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT-691311.
BY ADV. SRI.PRAVEEN K. JOY
OTHER PRESENT:
SR.GP SRI.P.P.THAJUDEEN
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29-07-2019, THE COURT ON 06-08-2019 DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W.P.(C) No.3644 of 2019
-3-
JUDGMENT
K.VINOD CHANDRAN, J.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as of now, there is no threat subsisting and the writ petition may be dismissed as infructuous. The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/-
K.VINOD CHANDRAN JUDGE
Sd/JUDGE
Scl/ 6.08
NINAN LUKOSE
THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE
THE RURAL SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
THE DYSP, PUNALUR
SHO, KADAKKAL POLICE STATION
SHAJI DANIEL
K.VINOD CHANDRAN
V.G.ARUN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
