M.G. Rathnan, v. District Telecom Committee
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court disposed of a writ petition by making an interim order, originally dated 20.02.2019, absolute. The petitioners sought quashing of a building permit and directions to public authorities.
What did the court decide?
The interim order dated 20.02.2019 was made absolute.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN
FRIDAY, THE 09TH DAY OF AUGUST 2019 / 18TH SRAVANA, 1941
WP(C).No.3412 OF 2019(B)
PETITIONERS:
1 M.G. RATHNAN, AGED 61 YEARS, S/O GOVINDAN, POOVOTTU CHARUVILA VEEDU, MYLODE P.O., POOYAPALLY, KOLLAM DISTRICT-691 537. 2 THANKAMANI N., S/O THANKAPPAN ACHARY, SIBI SADANAM, KAYILA, MYLODE P.O., POOYAPALLY, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN-691 537. 3 MRS.SOJI GEORGE, W/O ANEESH, POOVOTTU CHARUVILA VEEDU, MYLODE P.O., POOYAPALLY, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN--691 537. 4 OMANA RAGHAVAN ACHARY, W/O.RAGHAVAN ACHARY, VILAYIL VADAKKETHIL VEEDU, KAYILA, MYLODE P.O., POOYAPALLY, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN-691 537. 5 SABU T.C., CHERUVARAMBATH VEEDU, KAYILA, MYLODE P.O., POOYAPALLY, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN-691 537. 6 KUNJUKRISHNA PILLA, S/O KESAVA PILLA, PUTHUVA PUTHENVEEDU, KAYILA, MYLODE P.O., POOYAPALLY, KOLLAM DISTRICT-691537. BY ADV. SMT.K.K.RAZIA
WP(C).No.3412 OF 2019(B)
-2-
RESPONDENTS:
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the interim order in WP No.40694/2018 should be made absolute versus dismissed.
是否需要命令剩余被告对投诉采取行动。
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M.G. Rathnan
- petitioner
Thankamani N
- petitioner
Mrs. Soji George
- petitioner
Omana Raghavan Achary
- petitioner
Sabu T.C.
- petitioner
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court