for administration of the waqf in question. The 2nd respondent Board, on adjudication of the matter with notice to the parties, had arrived at a conclusion that the waqf in question is a public waqf and is not a family waqf and that there exists no written bye-laws for administration. From the materials available, it was also found that, there exists mismanagement from the side of the respondents before the Waqf Board. Hence the Board found that it is highly necessary to take over the waqf by the Board by permitting the representation of the 'Mutawalli Family' and local people from the locality. The Board observed that waqf has got very valuable properties and buildings, but only a meager income is derived out of those properties. Hence the Board directed the 1st respondent to appoint a competent person as 'Interim Mutawalli' to trace out the properties of the waqf and to take steps to recover the properties as per the Rules. Further it was observed by the Board that, it is a fit case for framing a scheme under Section 69 of the Waqf Act, 1995 and therefore the Divisional Officer of the 2nd respondent Board at Kannur was directed to prepare a draft scheme for management of the waqf in question. Consequent to Ext.P3 order passed by the Board on 9th July, 2019, the 1st respondent had issued Ext.P4 proceedings appointing the 3rd respondent herein as Interim Mutawalli. Ext.P6
