Manju S. v. Indian Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
Disposing a writ petition by directing the Chief Judicial Magistrate to consider the underlying enquiry before deferring a claim for prorata adjustment of sale consideration, leaving the matter for appropriate proceedings.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition disposed of; prayer for prorata adjustment deferred; directions issued to Chief Judicial Magistrate to pass final orders on M.C. No. 365/2016 within two months.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI
THURSDAY, THE 07TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2019 / 16TH KARTHIKA, 1941
WP(C).No.3176 OF 2016(V)
PETITIONER/S:
MANJU S.
SOUMYA, MANAKKARA, SASTHAMCOTTAH P.O., KOLLAM.
BY ADV. SRI.N.D.PREMACHANDRAN
RESPONDENT/S:
- 1 INDIAN BANK
- REPRESENTED BY BRANCH MANAGER, KOLLAM BRANCH, KOLLAM-691 501.
- 2 THE AUTHORISED OFFICER INDIAN BANK, KOLLAM BRANCH, KOLLAM-691 501.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
MANJU S.
- respondent
INDIAN BANK
Coram
S.V. BHATTI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court