The petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition. The court granted the petition, and the writ was dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive legal issue was decided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN
TUESDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2019 / 5TH AGRAHAYANA, 1941
WP(C).No.31722 OF 2019(M)
PETITIONER :
JAI SHANKAR V.P., AGED 39 YEARS, S/O. (LATE) V.VIJAYAKUMAR, RESIDING AT 13E, PERIYAR THEERAM APARTMENTS, KADATHUKADAVU DESOM, ALUVA - 683 102.
BY ADV. SRI.A.JAYASANKAR
RESPONDENTS :
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26.11.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING :
WP(C).No.31722 OF 2019(M)
2
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks
permission to withdraw this writ petition without prejudice to the rights of the petitioner to move at a later stage, if necessary. Permission granted.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/-
SATHISH NINAN, JUDGE
RKM
JAI SHANKAR V.P.
THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (RURAL), ALUVA
THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NEDUMBASSERY
P.P.KRISHNAN
FRANKLIN
SATHISH NINAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
