is against an order granting the review in part. Hence, appeal is the proper remedy. The only question therefore is whether this Court can entertain the original petition by converting it into an appeal. No doubt, in Nawab Shaqabath Ali Khan (supra) the Apex Court has observed that if the High Court has the jurisdiction to entertain either an appeal or a revision application or a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India in a given case, subject to fulfillment of other conditions, the Court could convert a revision application or a writ petition into an appeal or vice versa in exercise of its inherent power. The said observation is made with the rider that the exercise of such jurisdiction shall be subject to an appropriate case being made out. In Jumailath Beevi (supra) the Division Bench found that an order under Rule 29 of Order 21 issued by the Family Court being a final order, the remedy against the order is by way of an appeal under Section 19(1) of the Family Courts Act, 1984. After holding so, the Division Bench decided to dispose of the original petition on merits observing that as an appeal from the order of the Family Court is also considered by a bench of two Judges, no prejudice will be caused to either of the parties by the original petition being considered on merits.
