The writ petition was not pressed by the learned counsel for the petitioner due to non-compliance with a court order dated 18.10.2019. The court dismissed the petition accordingly.
The writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI
WEDNESDAY, THE 06TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2019 / 15TH KARTHIKA, 1941
WP(C).No.26775 OF 2019(V)
PETITIONER/S:
SUNITHA T.K AGED 48 YEARS W/O. JAYARAJAN, AANDIYATH HOSUE, KUNNATHERI, KARIYANNUR, ERUMAPETTY P.O. THRISSUR TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SMT.M.R.REENA
RESPONDENT/S:
1 THE BRANCH MANAGER STATE BANK OF INDIA, CHOWANNUR BRANCH, THRISSUR DISTRICT 688 001.
2 THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER, STATE BANK OF INDIA, REGIONAL BUSINESS OFFICE REGION 3, THRISSUR 688 001.
SC G.G. MANOJ
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06.11.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) No.26775 OF 2019
-2-
JUDGMENT
Adv.M.R Reena appearing for petitioner states that
the petitioner could not comply with the condition imposed by this Court vide order dated 18.10.2019. She is instructed to not press the writ petition.
Hence, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Sd/-
S.V.BHATTI
JUDGE
JS
Sunitha T.K.
The Branch Manager State Bank of India
The Authorized Officer State Bank of India
S.V.Bhatti
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
