Disposed

Orange Tree Properties v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC16 Dec 2019WP(C)/16254/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam closed Writ Petition (Civil) No. 16254 of 2019 (F) filed by Orange Tree Properties and Ganya Realtors against the State and Revenue Officials. The Court observed that the Revenue Divisional Officer had already passed an order, rendering further directions unnecessary. The petition was disposed of without detailed adjudication.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was closed as the Revenue Divisional Officer had already passed an order, rendering further directions unnecessary.

Orange Tree Properties Vs State of Kerala — Land Acquisition | Kerala HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN

¶4

MONDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2019 / 25TH AGRAHAYANA, 1941

¶5

WP(C).No.16254 OF 2019(F)

¶6

PETITIONERS:

¶7

1 ORANGE TREE PROPERTIES, OFFICE NO. 22/4B, BERATENA AGRAHARA VILLAGE, BEGUR HOBLI, BENGALURES SOUTH TALUK, BANGALORE, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE.

¶8

2 M/S. GANYA REALTORS AND DEVELOPERS PVT LTD, DOOR NO.33/2440 H, 6TH FLOOR, COMPASS COMMERCIAL COMPLEX, THAMMANAM P.O, ERNAKULAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR - JACOB KALLUVILA BABU

¶9

SRI.M.SASINDRAN SRI.V.VENUGOPAL

¶10

RESPONDENTS:

¶11

1 STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT AGRICULTURAL DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001

¶12

2 THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, FORT KOCHI, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT 682 001

¶13

3 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM 682 030

¶14

4 SANTHOSH, S/O. MADHAVAN, KUNNUNKAL HOUSE, KUMBALAM NORTH, KUMBALAM VILLAGE, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT 682 506

¶15

5 SANALKUMAR @ SANI, S/O. VELAPPAN, KALAPPURA HOUSE, KUMBALAM NORTH DESOM, KUMBALAM VILLAGE, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT 682 506

¶16

SRI.TITUS MANI SRI.JOSEPH J.THAYAMKERIL SR.GP.- RAJASEKHARAN NAIR

¶17

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16.12.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶18

WP(C).No.16254 OF 2019(F)

¶19

¶20

JUDGMENT

¶21

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Revenue Divisional Officer (RDO) has already passed an order and that no further directions are required in this writ petition.

¶22

This writ petition is thus closed.

¶23

Sd/- DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN

¶24

JUDGE

¶25

Stu

¶26

WP(C).No.16254 OF 2019(F)

¶27

¶28

APPENDIX

¶29

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

¶30

EXHIBIT P1	TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION ISSUED BY THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES
EXHIBIT P2	TRUE COPY OF THE SALE DEED NO.94/2018 OF SRO MARADU DATED 09-01-2018
EXHIBIT P3	TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE RESPONDENTS 4 AND 5 BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P4	TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 18-07-2017
EXHIBIT P5	TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION FILED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P5 A	TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE OFFICE OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT ON RECEIPT OF EXHIBIT P5 OBJECTION.
RESPONDENT'S/S	EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT R4(1)	DATED 9.7.2017 TRUE COPY OF PETITION NO.124166/17/K2 SUBMITTED BY SHAJI KUTTIKAT AND AUGUSTINE MANKUZHI TO THE RDO/SUB COLLECTOR, FORT COCHIN.
EXHIBIT R4(2)	DATED 11/01/2019, TRUE COPY OF THE PLAINT FILED IN OS NO.63/2019 OF THE MUNSIFF COURT I AT ERNAKULAM FILED BY ADV. JOSEPH J. THAYAMKERIL.
EXHIBIT R4(3)	DATED 18/01/2019 TRUE COPY OF REPLY BY RDO/S OFFICE TO AFORESAID PETITION DATED 18/12/2018.
EXHIBIT R4(4)	DATED 08/08/2017 TRUE COPY OF REPORT SUBMITTED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER, KUMBALAM VILLAGE TO THE RDO/SUB COLLECTOR, FORT COCHIN.
EXHIBIT R4(5)	DATED 09/08/2017 TRUE COPY OF REPORT SUBMITTED BY THE AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, KUMBALAM GRAMA PANCHAYAT TO THE RDO/SUB-COLLECTOR, FORTCOCHIN.
EXHIBIT R4(6)	DATED 02/02/2018 REPLY TO THE PLAINTIFF UNDER THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT ENCLOSING CERTIFIED COPY OF THE REPORT NO.336/17 DATED 03/10/2017 AND THE SECOND REPORT NO.395/17 DATED NIL SUBMITTED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER, KUMBALAM VILLAGE TO THE ADDITIONAL TAHSILDAR (LR) KANAYANNUR, AND A COPY OF THE REPORT SUBMITTED BY JS/DY. TAHSILDAR.

¶31

WP(C).No.16254 OF 2019(F)

¶32

¶33

EXHIBIT R4(7) DATED 06/06/2018 TRUE COPY OF COMMISSION REPORT AND A SKETCH SUBMITTED BY THE ADVOCATE COMMISSIONER IN IA NO.1750/2018 IN OS NO.259/2018 OF THE 2ND ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF COURT AT ERNAKULAM.

¶34

EXHIBIT R4(8)	DATED 04/12/2018 SALE DEED NO.2453/1/2018 OF SRO MARADU EXECUTED BY 2ND PETITIONER COMPANY IN FAVOUR OF MR. LALAN (19TH DEFENDANT IN R4(2) CASE.
EXHIBIT R4(9)	DATED 15/09/2018 TRUE COPY OF THE PROSECUTION PETITION (ALONG WITH PHOTOGRAPH OF ROAD WORK) NO.15822/17 SUBMITTED BY SANTHOSH KUNNUMKAL AND OTHERS BEFORE THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR (LR), CIVIL STATION, KAKKANAD, KOCHI-682030.
EXHIBIT R4(10)	DATED 26/09/2018 DIRECTION BY DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM ADDRESSED TO THE TAHSILDAR (LR) KANAYANNUR.
EXHIBIT R4(11)	DATED 25/10/2018 DIRECTION BY THE TAHSILDAR (LR) KANAYANNUR ADDRESSED TO THE VILLAGE OFFICER, KUMBALAM VILLAGE OFFICER.

¶35

//TRUE COPY//

¶36

P.A TO JUDGE.

Orange Tree Properties v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Orange Tree Properties v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V.v.Raman, Vs State of Kerala

Jose John Vs the District Collector

M/S. Confident Projects India Pvt.Ltd Vs the State of Kerala

Ramachandran Vs Kulukkallur Grama Panchayath

Joby M C Vs State of Kerala

Pourasamithi,Rep by Its Secretary Vs District Collector,Malappuram