Disposed

K.Chandra Das v. the Secretary

Kerala HC18 Jan 2019WP(C)/1541/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court dismissed the writ petition by directing the Respondent to consider and dispose of the petitioner's request for timetable revision within six weeks, after conducting a conference with the petitioner and other affected operators.

What did the court decide?

Directions to the respondent to consider the request for timing revision within six weeks after a conference with affected operators.

K.Chandra Das Vs the Secretary — Service and Employment | Kerala HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN

¶4

FRIDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF JANUARY 2019 / 28TH POUSHA, 1940

¶5

WP(C).No. 1541 of 2019

¶6

PETITIONER:

¶7

K.CHANDRA DAS, AGED 49 YEARS, S/O. KARAPPAN, KAROTH HOUSE, KARAKKUNNU P.O., MANJERI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.

¶8

BY ADV. SRI.SAJU J.VALLYARA

¶9

RESPONDENT:

¶10

THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MALAPPURAM, PIN - 676 505.

¶11

SRI K.P.HARISH, SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER

¶12

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18.01.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WPC 1541 OF 2019

JUDGMENT

The petitioner, who is the holder of a regular permit on the route Manjeri-Kalikavu in respect of his stage carriage bearing registration No.KL-33/A-7300 with the timing settled as per the proceedings dated 12.01.2017, has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the respondent to consider and dispose of Ext.P1 request submitted by the petitioner for revision of timings in respect of his stage carriage bearing registration No.KL-33/A-7300 operating on the route Manjeri-Kalikavu within a time limit to be fixed by this Court, after giving an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner and other affected operators.

¶17

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Senior Government Pleader appearing for the respondent.

¶18

Since Ext.P1 request made by the petitioner is pending consideration before the respondent, this writ petition is disposed of, without going into the merits

¶19

WPC 1541 OF 2019 3

¶20

of the case, by directing the respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P1 request made by the petitioner for revision of timings in respect of his stage carriage, strictly in accordance with law, with notice to the petitioner and also to other enroute operators, after convening a timing conference, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.

¶21

Sd/-

¶22

ANIL K. NARENDRAN JUDGE

WPC 1541 OF 2019

APPENDIX

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

¶28

EXHIBIT P1 PHOTOCOPY OF THE REQUEST DATED 05.01.2019 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT.

¶29

RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:NIL

¶30

TRUE COPY

¶31

P.A. TO JUDGE

K.Chandra Das v. the Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Chandra Das v. the Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nassar Hussain Vs the Secretary

The Kaduthuruthy Urban Co-Op Bank NO.K-399, Vs State of Kerala

Nassar M.B., Vs the Secretary

Beeja Vs Regional Transport Authority

Abdul Sathar, Vs District Collector

Mohammed Ashraf Vs State Co-Operative Election Commission