Disposed

K.K.Mohammed Ali v. Assistant Labour Officer

Kerala HC24 May 2019WP(C)/14338/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single-bench writ petition sought a direction for the expeditious disposal of applications filed under Rule 26A of Kerala Headload Workers Rules, 1981. The Court directed the respondents to consider the applicants' petitions within six weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Exhibits P2 to P4 applications expeditiously and preferably within six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

K.K.Mohammed Ali Vs Assistant Labour Officer — Labour and Industrial Disputes | Kerala HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI

¶4

FRIDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF MAY 2019 / 3RD JYAISHTA, 1941

¶5

WP(C).No. 14338 of 2019

¶6

PETITIONER/S:

¶7

1 K.K.MOHAMMED ALI

¶8

AGED 47 YEARS

¶9

S/O. KADARKUTTY, MAMBURAM CEMENT AGENCIES, BYPASS ROAD, NEAR CIVIL STATION, CHEMMAD, TIRURANGADI, RESIDING AT KOLANGARAKATH HOUSE, P.O.MAMBURAM, TIRURANGADI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.

¶10

2 C. V. ABDUL AZEEZ AGED 39 YEARS

¶11

S/O. SUBRAMANIAN, CHAKKACHAM VEETTIL, OLAPEEDIKA, PARIYAPURAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676 302.

¶12

3 K. SENTHIL AGED 38 YEARS S/O. KALLYAMOORTHI, SOUTH STREET, ANAIKUDAM P.O, KODALIKARUPPUR VIA, ARIYALUR DISTRICT, TAMIL NADU.

¶13

4 ABDUL SALAM AGED 46 YEARS

¶14

S/O. ABDUL RAHIMAN, PARAPPURATH HOUSE, KUMBAN KADAVU ROAD, CHEMMAD, TIRURANGADI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676 306.

¶15

BY ADVS.

¶16

SRI.K.P.SUDHEER SRI.J.RAMKUMAR

¶17

RESPONDENT/S:

¶18

1 ASSISTANT LABOUR OFFICER TIRURANGADI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676 306.

¶19

2 KERALA HEADLOAD WORKERS WELFARE BOARD MALAPPURAM DISTRICT COMMITTEE, MALAPPURAM - 676 505, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN.

¶20

SC SRI. THOMAS ABRAHAM., GP SRI. MATHEW GEORGE VADAKKEL

¶21

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24.05.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

W.P.(C)No.14338/19

-2-

JUDGMENT

` Heard Sri.K.P.Sudheer, the learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri.Thomas Abraham, the learned Standing Counsel and Sri.Mathew George Vadakkel, the learned Government Pleader.

¶26

The petitioners seek a direction for consideration and expeditious disposal of Exts.P2 to P4 applications filed under Rule 26A of Kerala Headload Workers Rules, 1981. This Court after hearing the learned counsel appearing for the parties is of the view that the petitioners are entitled for a direction to respondents for expeditious disposal of Exts.P2 to P4. The writ petition is disposed of by directing the 1^st respondent to consider and pass orders on Exts.P2 to P4 applications expeditiously and preferably within six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

Sd/-

S.V.BHATTI JUDGE

W.P.(C)No.14338/19

-3-

APPENDIX

PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:

¶34

EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF LICENCE DATED 16.5.2019 ISSUED BY TIRURANGADI MUNICIPALITY.

¶35

EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF APPLICATION NO.191690 DATED 2.4.2019 SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONR BEFORE THE IST RESPONDENT UNDER SEC.26A. EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF APPLICATION NO.191695 SUBMITTED BY THE 3RD PETITIONER BEFORE THE IST RESPONDENT UNDER SEC.26A.

¶36

EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF APPLICATION NO.191701 DATED 2.4.2019 SUBMITTED BY THE 4TH PETITIONER BEFORE THE IST RESPONDENT UNDER SEC.26A.

¶37

RESPONDENT'S/S EXHIBITS: NIL

¶38

//TRUE COPY//

¶39

PA TO JUDGE

K.K.Mohammed Ali v. Assistant Labour Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.K.Mohammed Ali v. Assistant Labour Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.John Thomas Vs State of Kerala

P.R.Ajeeesh Vs the Joint Regional Transport Officer

P.K.Murali Vs the State Tax Officer

Simi Santhosh Vs the District Labour Officer

Ittithanam Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd., Vs Income Tax Officer

Sajunath K S Vs Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.