Disposed

M/S.Consolidated Construction Consortium Limited v. the State Tax Officer

Kerala HC23 May 2019WP(C)/14230/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In WP(C) No. 14230 of 2019, the High Court of Kerala disposed of the petition by directing the 2nd respondent to consider and dispose of delay and stay petitions expeditiously within two months and stayed recovery proceedings for two months.

What did the court decide?

Directing the 2nd respondent to dispose of delay and stay petitions within two months; recovery proceedings stayed for two months.

M/S.Consolidated Construction Consortium Limited Vs the… — Banking and Recovery | Kerala HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI

¶4

THURSDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF MAY 2019 / 2ND JYAISHTA, 1941

¶5

WP(C).No. 14230 of 2019

¶6

PETITIONER/S:

¶7

M/S.CONSOLIDATED CONSTRUCTION CONSORTIUM LIMITED 12/44, WALAYAR DAM.P.O., WALAYAR, PALAKKAD, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY, SRI.T.MURUGAN.

¶8

BY ADVS.

¶9

SRI.N.MURALEEDHARAN NAIR SRI.S.JAFFERALI

¶10

RESPONDENT/S:

¶11

1 THE STATE TAX OFFICER, WORKS CONTRACT, STATE GOODS SERVICE TAX DEPARTMENT (KERALA), PALAKKAD-678001.

¶12

2 THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (APPEALS), DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, PALAKKAD-678001.

¶13

3 THE INSPECTING ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, PALAKKAD-678001.

¶14

GP DR. THUSHARA JAMES

¶15

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23.05.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶16

WP(C).No. 14230 of 2019

¶17

-2-

¶18

JUDGMENT

¶19

Heard Sri.N.Muraleedharan Nair, the learned counsel for the

¶20

petitioner and Dr.Thushara James, the learned Government Pleader.

¶21

The petitioner prays for a direction to the 2^nd respondent to

¶22

consider and dispose of Exts.P9 to P12 delay petitions and Exts.P13 to P16 stay petitions expeditiously.

¶23

Having regard to the circumstances of the case, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 2^nd respondent to consider and dispose of Exts.P9 to P12 delay petitions and Exts.P13 to P16 stay petitions as expeditiously as possible, preferably within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

¶24

The recovery proceedings pursuant to the orders under appeal

¶25

before the 2^nd respondent are stayed for two months from today.

Sd/-

S.V.BHATTI

JUDGE

WP(C).No. 14230 of 2019

¶31

-3-

¶32

APPENDIX

¶33

PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:

¶34

EXHIBIT P1	TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER PASSED
	BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2012- 13 DATED 10.8.2017.
EXHIBIT P2	TRUE COPY OF THE RECTIFIED ASSESSMENT ORDER PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2013-14 DATED 6.6.2018.
EXHIBIT P3	TRUE COPY OF THE RECTIFIED ASSESSMENT ORDER PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2014-15 DATED 26.4.2018.
EXHIBIT P4	TRUE COPY OF THE RECTIFIED ASSESSMENT ORDER PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 15-16 DATED 11.5.2018.
EXHIBIT P5	TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2012-13 DATED 18.5.2019.
EXHIBIT P6	TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2013-14 DATED 18.5.2019.
EXHIBIT P7	TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2014-15 DATED 18.5.2019.
EXHIBIT P8	TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2015-16 DATED 18.5.2019.
EXHIBIT P9	TRUE COPY OF THE DELAY CONDONATION PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2012-13 DATED 18.5.2019.
EXHIBIT P10	TRUE COPY OF THE DELAY CONDONATION PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2013-14 DATED 18.5.2019.
EXHIBIT P11	TRUE COPY OF THE DELAY CONDONATION PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2014-15 DATED 18.5.2019.

¶35

WP(C).No. 14230 of 2019

¶36

-4-

¶37

EXHIBIT P12	TRUE COPY OF PETITION FIL THE 2ND RESP DATED 18.5.2	THE ED BY ONDEN 019.	DELAY CONDONATION THE PETITIONER BEFORE T FOR THE YEAR 2015-16
EXHIBIT P13	TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION FOR THE YEAR	THE ER BE 2012	STAY PETITION FILED BY FORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT -13 DATED 18.5.2019.
EXHIBIT P14	TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION FOR THE YEAR	THE ER BE 2013	STAY PETITION FILED BY FORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT -14 DATED 18.5.2019.
EXHIBIT P15	TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION FOR THE YEAR	THE ER BE 2014	STAY PETITION FILED BY FORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT -15 DATED 18.5.2019.
EXHIBIT P16	TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION FOR THE YEAR	THE ER BE 2015	STAY PETITION FILED BY FORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT -16 DATED 18.5.2019.
EXHIBIT P17	TRUE COPY OF NO.12 ISSUED YEAR 2012-13	THE BY 1 DATE	DEMAND NOTICE IN FORM ST RESPONDENT FOR THE D 10.8.2017.
EXHIBIT P18	TRUE COPY OF SECTION 7 OF ACT ISSUED B YEAR 2013-14	THE THE Y 3RD DATE	DEMAND NOTICE UNDER KERALA REVENUE RECOVERY RESPONDENT FOR THE D 18.9.2018.
EXHIBIT P19	TRUE COPY OF SECTION 7 OF ACT ISSUED B YEAR 2014-15	THE THE Y 3RD DATE	DEMAND NOTICE UNDER KERALA REVENUE RECOVERY RESPONDENT FOR THE D 18.9.2018.
EXHIBIT P20	TRUE COPY OF SECTION 7 OF ACT ISSUED B YEAR 2015-16	THE THE Y 3RD DATE	DEMAND NOTICE UNDER KERALA REVENUE RECOVERY RESPONDENT FOR THE D 4.9.2018.

¶38

RESPONDENT'S/S EXHIBITS: NIL

¶39

//TRUE COPY//

¶40

PA TO JUDGE

M/S.Consolidated Construction Consortium Limited v. the State Tax Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S.Consolidated Construction Consortium Limited v. the State Tax Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.T.Sajeevan Vs the Welfare Fund Inspector

Abbas, Vs the Motor Vehicles Taxation Officer Cum Regional Transport Officer

M/S.Teekay Agencies, Vs Assistant Commissioner of State Tax Spl. Circle

P.John Thomas Vs State of Kerala

P.R.Ajeeesh Vs the Joint Regional Transport Officer

P.K.Murali Vs the State Tax Officer