Disposed

R.Jayasankar v. the Commercial Tax Officer

Kerala HC12 Apr 2019WP(C)/11880/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single-judge High Court of Kerala disposed of a writ petition by directing the Kerala State Tax Appellate Tribunal to consider and decide the petitioner's stay petition within two months, simultaneously staying recovery proceedings.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the second respondent to consider and dispose of the stay petition (Ext.P4) within two months; recovery proceedings stayed.

R.Jayasankar Vs the Commercial Tax Officer — Property and Title | Kerala HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI

¶4

FRIDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF APRIL 2019 / 22ND CHAITHRA, 1941

¶5

WP(C).No. 11880 of 2019

¶6

PETITIONER/S:

¶7

R.JAYASANKAR,AGED 60 YEARS S/O.RAGHAVA MENON, PROPRIETOR M/S.CHELUR INDUSTRIES, R.MADHAVAN NAIR ROAD ERNAKULAM, KOCHI682016.

¶8

BY ADVS. SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENON SMT.MEERA V.MENON

¶9

RESPONDENT/S:

¶10

1 THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER 3RD CIRCLE, ERNAKULAM- 682015.

¶11

2 THE KERALA STATE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL SALES TAX COMPLEX, THEVARA, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI- 682015, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.

¶12

GP.DR.THUSHARA JAMES

¶13

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12.04.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶14

WP(C).No. 11880 of 2019

¶15

¶16

JUDGMENT

¶17

Heard the petitioner's counsel and Dr.Thushara James, the learned Government Pleader.

¶18

The petitioner prays for a direction to the second respondent to consider and dispose of Ext.P4 stay petition expeditiously.

¶19

Having regard to the circumstances of the case the writ petition is disposed of directing the second respondent to consider and dispose of Ext.P4 stay petition as expeditiously as possible, preferably within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

¶20

The recovery proceedings pursuant to the orders under appeal before the second respondent are stayed.

¶21

Sd/- Sd/-

¶22

S.V.BHATTI, JUDGE

¶23

¶24

WP(C).No. 11880 of 2019

¶25

¶26

APPENDIX

¶27

PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:

¶28

EXHIBIT P1	COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2009-10 DATED 29.12.2015.
EXHIBIT P2	COPY OF ORDER ISSUED BY THE DY.COMMISSIONER (APPEALS), ERNAKULAM FOR THE YEAR 2009-10 DATED 24.12.2018.
EXHIBIT P3	COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2009-10 DATED 04.04.2019.
EXHIBIT P4 sd	COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2009-10 DATED 04.04.2019.

R.Jayasankar v. the Commercial Tax Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Jayasankar v. the Commercial Tax Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S. Madai Co-Operative Rural Bank Ltd. Vs the Income Tax Officer

Wexco Homes (P) Ltd. Vs the State Tax Officer (Wc)

R.v.Muhammed Sheriff, Vs the Commercial Tax Officer (Works Contact)

M/S Cute Look Vs the State Tax Officer

O.Dinesh Kumar, Vs Income Tax Officer

M/S. Prestige Estates Projects Ltd. Vs the Assistant Commissioner(Wc)