Nithya.G v. Vishnu.R
Case brief
What is this about?
Competing University and PSC lists governed recruitment of Assistants. The court affirmed 334 University-list appointments made before the PSC list became effective, cancelled later provisional appointments without salary recovery, and directed recruitment from the PSC list to the resulting and reported vacancies. The connected matters had mixed outcomes.
What did the court decide?
334 University-list appointments affirmed; salary recovery barred for terminated provisional appointees; PSC-list appointments directed to resulting and reported substantive vacancies.