Mini.T.R v. Ajith Kumar
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought transfer of a family suit from Alappuzha to Ernakulam Family Court due to travel difficulties while caring for minor children. The court allowed the transfer, deeming no prejudice to the respondent likely.
What did the court decide?
O.P.No.1063 of 2018 transferred from Family Court, Alappuzha to Family Court, Ernakulam with file transmission and new listing.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL THOMAS
THURSDAY, THE 04TH DAY OF APRIL 2019 / 14TH CHAITHRA, 1941 Tr.P(C).No. 80 of 2019
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OP 1063/2018 of FAMILY COURT, ALAPPUZHA
PETITIONER/RESPONDENT:
MINI.T.R AGED 45 YEARS DAUGHTER OF T.R.RAGHAVAN, SAAVARIYA, EDATHALA, KUZHIVELIPADI P.O., ALUVA - 683 561.
BY ADVS. SRI.B.ASHOK SHENOY SRI.K.V.GEORGE SRI.P.N.RAJAGOPALAN NAIR SRI.P.S.GIREESH SRI.RIYAL DEVASSY
RESPONDENT/PETITIONER:
AJITH KUMAR AGED 52 YEARS, SON OF LATE KARTHIKEYAN, SAAVARIYA, PAZHAVEEDU P.O., ALAPPUZHA - 688 009.
THIS TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04.04.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the transfer of a family court case to a different court to reduce travel burden for a party will cause prejudice to the other side.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
MINI.T.R
- respondent
AJITH KUMAR
Coram
SUNIL THOMAS
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court