Manju v. Titto M
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court of Kerala allowed a transfer petition moving a divorce proceeding from Family Court, Kottayam to Family Court, Alappuzha due to the petitioner's residence and lack of accompaniment.
What did the court decide?
The Original Petition (HMA) No.584/2018 pending with the Family Court, Kottayam at Ettumanoor is quashed and transferred to the Family Court, Alappuzha.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN
MONDAY ,THE 14TH DAY OF JANUARY 2019 / 24TH POUSHA, 1940
Tr.P(C).No. 485 of 2018
OP(HMA) NO. 584/2018 of FAMILY COURT, KOTTAYAM
PETITIONER/ RESPONDENT IN OP:
MANJU AGED 38,D/O. RAMAKRISHNAN, UTHARAPPALLY VEEDU,THAMABAKACHUVADU KARA, ARYANADU NORTH P.O, MANNANCHERRY PANCHAYATH,ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT PIN 688 542.
BY ADVS. SRI.R.SURAJ KUMAR SMT.V.DEEPA SRI.SUNIL J.CHAKKALACKAL
RESPONDENT/ PETITIONER IN OP: TITTO M AGED 39, S/O. VISHNATHAN, SHASTHAPURAM VEEDU,PEROOOR P.O, PEROOR VILLAGE,KOTTAYAM DISTRICT PIN 686 637.
THIS TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 14.01.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the transfer of a pending suit for divorce from Family Court, Kottayam to Family Court, Alappuzha is warranted due to distance and inability of the petitioner to appear.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
MANJU AGED 38, D/O. RAMAKRISHNAN
- respondent
TITTO M AGED 39, S/O. VISHNATHAN
Coram
SATHISH NINAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court