Tom Thomas, v. Annamma
Case brief
What is this about?
This transfer petition was closed without entertaining plea. The Single Judge noted that two connected matters were transferred to the Sub Court, Kottayam, per orders represented as Exts. P2 and P3. Consequently, the petitioner was directed to approach the District Court. The court was not inclined to entertain the present transfer petition.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR
SATURDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2019 / 25TH KARTHIKA, 1941
Tr.P(C).No.151 OF 2019
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OS 66/2015 OF MUNSIFF COURT, PALA
PETITIONER/S:
TOM THOMAS, AGED 66 YEARS S/O.N.J. THOMAS, NILAKCAPPILLIL HOUSE, VI/216A, THRIKKAKARA, KOCHI-21
BY ADV. SRI.P.BABU KUMAR
RESPONDENT/S:
- 1 ANNAMMA, D/O. THOMAS, NILACKAPILLIL HOUSE, KUDAKKACHIHRA P.O, VALLICHIRA VILLAGE, MEENACHIL TALUK, KOTTAYAM(DIED).
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the transfer petition should be entertained given that the case was referred back to the District Court by other connected matters.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
TOM THOMAS
- respondent
ANNAMMA
- respondent
JOSEPH
- respondent
FRANCIS
- respondent
ABRAHAM
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court