The second appeal was dismissed as the appellant and counsel remained absent without representation, and no steps were taken against the respondents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
TUESDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF MARCH 2019 / 28TH PHALGUNA, 1940
SA.No. 929 of 2000 (B)
AGAINST THE DECREE AND JUDGMENT DATED 27.07.2000 IN AS No.68/1999 of ADDITIONAL SUB COURT, THALASSERY
AGAINST THE DECREE AND JUDGMENT DATED 09.08.1999 IN OS No.67/1998 of PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF COURT, KANNUR
APPELLANT/RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF:
THOTTILE PURAYIL NABEESA, D/o EBRAHIM, AGED 56 YEARS, AZHIKODE AMSOM DESOM, P.O.AZHIKODE.
RESPONDENTS/APPELLANTS/DEFENDANTS :
THIS SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19.03.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
S.A.No.929 of 2000
2
JUDGMENT
The appellant and counsel remained absent and there was no representation. No fresh vakalath was received so far.
No steps were taken as against R1 and R2. As such, this Court has no other option, but to dismiss the appeal for non prosecution. Hence, the second appeal is dismissed for non prosecution.
Sd/-
P.SOMARAJAN
JUDGE
DMR/-
THOTTILE PURAYIL NABEESA
THOTTILE PURAYIL JAMEELA
THOTTILE PURAYIL SUBAIDA
P.SOMARAJAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
