C.Sivadas v. C.Leela Krishnan
Case brief
What is this about?
This court dismissed a second appeal for non-prosecution as the learned counsel for the appellants reported no instructions from the parties on the date of hearing.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
MONDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF MARCH 2019 / 27TH PHALGUNA, 1940
SA.No. 581 of 2000 (C)
AGAINST THE DECREE AND JUDGMENT DATED 29.02.2000 IN AS No. 87/1992 of IInd ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT, PALAKKAD
AGAINST THE DECREE AND JUDGMENT DATED 31.01.1992 IN OS No.94/1988 of ADDITIONAL SUB COURT, PALAKKAD
APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS:
- 1 C.SIVADAS, SON OF KANNAN MENON, THORAPALAYAM, PUTHUR AMSOM, PALAKKAD TALUK.
- 2 C.SREEDEVI, WIFE OF SIVADAS, THORAPALAYAM, PUTHUR AMSOM, PALAKKAD TALUK.
BY ADVS.SRI.O.RAMACHANDRAN NAMBIAR SMT.BINDUMOL JOSEPH
Parties & counsel
- appellant
C.SIVADAS
- appellant
C.SREEDEVI
- respondent
C.LEELAKRISHNAN
- respondent
SHOBHANA
- respondent
KRISHNARAJ
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court