Dismissed
Udaya Roack Products v. Ayyampuzha Panchayath
Kerala HCRSA/758/2005
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
TUESDAY ,THE 05TH DAY OF MARCH 2019 / 14TH PHALGUNA, 1940
RSA.No. 757 of 2005
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN AS 2/2005 of DISTRICT COURT & SESSIONS COURT, ERNAKULAM DATED 01-02-2005
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OS 634/1993 of MUNSIFF COURT,ALUVA DATED 15-01-1997
APPELLANT/APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF:
UDHAYA ROACK PRODUCTS MANJAPRA, REPRESENTED BY MANAGING PARTNER,, JOHN KACHAPPILLY, AGED 50 YEARS,, S/O. CHAKKU KACHAPPILLY, KACHAPPILLY VEETTIL,, ANGAMALY KARA, ANGAMALY VILLAGE.
BY ADV. SRI.SAIBY JOSE KIDANGOOR
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/DEFENDANT: AYYAMMPUZHA PANCHYATH REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
BY ADV. SRI.K.ANAND
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 05.03.2019, ALONG WITH RSA.758/2005, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
RSA.Nos. 757/2005 & 758 of 2005 2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
TUESDAY ,THE 05TH DAY OF MARCH 2019 / 14TH PHALGUNA, 1940
RSA.No. 758 of 2005
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN AS 5/2005 of DISTRICT COURT & SESSIONS COURT, ERNAKULAM DATED 01-02-2005
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OS 692/1993 of MUNSIFF COURT,ALUVA DATED 15-01-1997
APPELLANT/APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF:
UDAYA ROACK PRODUCTS REPRESENTED BY MANAGING PARTNER,, JOHJN KACHAPPILLY, AGED 50 YEARS,, S/O.CHAKKU KACHAPPILLY, KACHAPPILLY VEETTIL,, ANGAMALY KARA, ANGAMALY VILLAGE.
BY ADV. SRI.SAIBY JOSE KIDANGOOR
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS:
1 AYYAMPUZHA PANCHAYATH
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
3 JOSEPH SO.JOSEPH CHETTIYAKKA, THOTTATHIL, DO. KARA.
BY ADVS. SRI.GEORGE VARGHESE KIZHAKKAMBALAM SRI.K.ANAND SRI.V.RAJENDRAN (PERUMBAVOOR)
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 05.03.2019, ALONG WITH RSA.757/2005, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
RSA.Nos. 757/2005 & 758 of 2005 3
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the appellant fairly submitted that the matter has become infructuous. Hence, both these appeals are dismissed as
infructuous.
Sd/-
P. SOMARAJAN JUDGE
pm
// TRUE COPY // PA TO JUDGE
UDHAYA ROACK PRODUCTS MANJAPRA
AYYAMMPUZHA PANCHYATH
KURIAKOSE SO.KURIAKKO CHERUSSERIL VEETIL
JOSEPH SO.JOSEPH CHETTIYAKKA
P SOMARAJAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court