Bindu v. Kuttan Asari
Case brief
What is this about?
A regular second appeal filed in 2006 was dismissed because the court could not issue notices to respondents 2 to 4 despite several postings over the last ten years due to non-prosecution.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
MONDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF MAY 2019 / 30TH VAISAKHA, 1941
RSA.No. 70 of 2006(G)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 26-10-1998 IN AS 303/1996 of SUB COURT, NEDUMANGAD
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 31-10-1990 IN OS 378/1987 OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF COURT,NEDUMANGAD
APPELLANT/PETITIONER IN SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION:
BINDU, D/O.THANKAMANI, VARUVILAKATHU VEEDU, KATHALLOOR MUTTATHU,, KADAMBANADU MURI, ARUVIKKARA VILLAGE,, TRIVANDRUM DISTRICT.
BY ADVS. SRI.M.DINESH SRI.BASANT BALAJI
RESPONDENTS/APPELLANT & RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFF & DEFENDANTS:
Parties & counsel
- appellant
BINDU
- respondent
BHAGAVATHY AMMA VIJAYAKUMARI AMMA
- respondent
V. KUTTAN ASARI
- respondent
SARASU
- respondent
GOPALAKRISHNAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court