Sri.Jinan v. Sri.Vijayan
Case brief
What is this about?
This regular second appeal was heard on 06.03.2019. The learned counsel for the appellants submitted that they were not pressing the appeal, leading the court to dismiss it as not pressed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 06TH DAY OF MARCH 2019 / 15TH PHALGUNA, 1940
RSA.No. 307 of 2004 (C)
AGAINST THE DECREE AND JUDGMENT DATED 22.10.2003 IN AS No.235/1999 of PRINCIPAL SUB COURT, IRINJALAKUDA
AGAINST THE DECREE AND JUDGMENT DATED 26.10.1999 IN OS No.1010/1998 of ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF COURT,IRINJALAKUDA
APPELLANTS/APPELLANTS/DEFENDANTS:
1 SRI.JINAN, S/o CHARAMPARAMBIL MANIKUTTY, EDAKULAM DESOM, POOMANGALAM VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT.
- 2 SMT. GEETHA, W/o JINAN, -DO-
APPELLANTS REPRESENTED BY THEIR POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER SRI.BABY, S/o KOLLAMPARAMBIL SANKARAN, VALLIVATTOM DESOM AND VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Sri. Jinan, S/o Charamparambil Manikutty
- appellant
Smt. Geetha, W/o Jinan
- respondent
Sri. Vijayan, S/o Chitteth Pankajakshy Amma
- respondent
Smt. Rajalekshmy, D/o Manjoly Sreedhara Menon
- respondent
Sri. Rajan, S/o Karumanthra Kumaran
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court