The second regular appeal was allowed as the matter was settled out of court via a compromise filed on a stamp paper, which would form part of the decree.
The appeal was allowed in accordance with the compromise arrived at by the parties, which formed part of the decree.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
THURSDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF JULY 2019 / 27TH ASHADHA, 1941
RSA.No.197 of 2009
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 30-06-2008 IN AS 35/2006 OF ADDITIONAL SUB COURT, THALASSERY
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 13.12.2005 IN OS 342/1996 OF MUNSIFF COURT, THALASSERY
APPELLANT/APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF:
A.M.VRINDA, D/O.GOPALAN, AGED 44, NO OCCUPATION, TELLICHERRY TALUK, KURUVANGAD AMSOM, DESOM, THALASSERY.
BY ADVS. SRI.K.MOHANAKANNAN SMT.M.A.ZOHRA
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS:
1 DR.PHILOMINA SEBASTIAN, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN, AGED 60, 'COSY', THALASSERY.
2 JANAKI, W/O. P.K. BALAKRISHNAN, AGED 68 P.K. NIVAS, FORT ROAD, THALASSERY.
BY ADVS. SRI.M.SASINDRAN - R2 & R3 SRI.GRASHIOUS KURIAKOSE (SR.)-R1
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18.07.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
RSA.No.197 of 2009 2
JUDGMENT
The matter was settled out of court. Compromise filed. The compromise engrafted in a stamp paper worth Rs.100/-. Hence, the appeal will stand allowed in accordance with the compromise arrived at the parties. The compromise would form part of the decree.
Sd/-
P.SOMARAJAN, JUDGE
pm
// TRUE COPY // PA TO JUDGE
A.M.VRINDA
DR.PHILOMINA SEBASTIAN
JANKI
BINDU
P.SOMARAJAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
