Vasu v. Raphel
Case brief
What is this about?
A regular second appeal was disposed of on the very same day it was heard. The court recorded that the appellants did not press the appeal and dismissed it as not pressed.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed as not pressed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
TUESDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF MAY 2019 / 31ST VAISAKHA, 1941
RSA.No. 1073 of 2009
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT & DECREE IN AS 38/2005 of ADDL SUB COURT,IRINJALAKUDA
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT & DECREE IN OS 2008/2003 of ADDL MUNSIFF COURT ,IRINJALAKUDA DATED 16-12-2008
APPELLANTS/APPELLANTS/DEFENDANTS:
1 VASU AGED 58 YEARS
S/O. THOTTIPPILLY MAKKU, MOORKKANADU DESOM, PORATHISSERY VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK.
2 JAYATHILAKAN AGED 52 YEARS
S/O. THOTTIPPILLY MAKKU, MOORKKANADU DESOM, PORATHISSERY VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
VASU
- appellant
JAYATHILAKAN
- respondent
RAPHEL
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court