Aparna Chandran, v. Gireesh.Kp
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS
WEDNESDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF JUNE 2019 / 5TH ASHADHA, 1941
RPFC.No.134 of 2019
AGAINST THE ORDER IN MC 298/2016 of FAMILY COURT, MALAPPURAM
REVISION PETITIONER/:PETITIONER
APARNA CHANDRAN, AGED 23 YEARS D/O CHANDRAN, SOUPARNIKA PADMALAYAM, ARUKIZHAYA MANJERI-POST, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
BY ADVS. SRI.P.VENUGOPAL (1086/92) SMT.T.J.MARIA GORETTI
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT:
GIREESH.KP, S/O GOPINATHAN K K, LAKSHMI NIVAS, KAKKAYOOR P O CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT PIN - 678 512.
BY ADVS. SRI.P.A.AZIZ SRI.I.G.MANOHARAN
THIS REV.PETITION(FAMILY COURT) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26.06.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
ALEXANDER THOMAS, J.
R.P.(FC)No. 134 of 2019
Dated this the 26th day of June, 2019
ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a 'not press'
memo dated 25.6.2019, which reads as follows:
“Revision petitioner does not want to pursue the above case further, as the disputes have been amicably settled with the respondent. In view of the specific instructions in this regard, continuation of the Revision Petition is unwarranted. In the circumstances, this Honourable Court may be pleased to dispose of R.P.(FC)No.134/2019 as 'Not Pressed'.
Recording the above said submission of the petitioner, it is
ordered that the above R.P.(FC) will stand dismissed as not pressed.
sd/-
ALEXANDER THOMAS, JUDGE
acd
APARNA CHANDRAN
GIREESH.KP
ALEXANDER THOMAS
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court