Laila v. Sirajudeen
Case brief
What is this about?
This review petition corrected a clerical mistake in a previous judgment, directing that the appeal against a partition suit be allowed and a preliminary decree for partition passed, allotting four-fifths shares to plaintiffs.
What did the court decide?
Review petition allowed; preliminary decree for partition passed, allotting 4/5th shares to plaintiffs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN
MONDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF AUGUST 2019/28TH SRAVANA, 1941
R.P.No.703 OF 2019 IN R.F.A.No.827/2010
(AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 28.06.2019 IN R.F.A. No.827/2010 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA)
REVIEW PETITIONER/APPELLANT:
1 LAILA, AGED 51 YEARS, D/O. ASUMA BEEVI, RESIDING AT SALMA, VEMPAYAM P. O., 695 615, TRIVANDRUM FROM ROSE VILLA, NEELIKULAM, ADINADU, KARUNAGAPPALLY.
2 SAFIYA, AGED 51 YEARS, D/O. ASUMA BEEVI, RESIDING AT KAMALIYAA MANSIL, KANIYAPURAM P. O., 695 301, TRIVANDRUM FROM ROSE VILLA, NEELIKULAM, ADINADU, KARUNAGAPPALLY.
3 SABEENA, AGED 48 YEARS, D/O. ASUMA BEEVI, RESIDING AT AZAD GARDEN, ASOKAPURAM, ALUVA P. O., 683 101 FROM ROSE VILLA, NEELIKULAM, ADINADU, KARUNAGAPPALLY.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
LAILA
- petitioner
SAFIYA
- petitioner
SABEENA
- petitioner
SALEENA
- respondent
SIRAJUDEEN
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court