Gopalakrishnan, v. Gopi
Case brief
What is this about?
This review petition challenged an order seeking expeditious disposal of a suit without noting its operation under Section 10 CPC stay. The Court recalled and allowed the review petition accordingly.
What did the court decide?
The judgment dated 23.1.2018 reviewed and recalled; the review petition is allowed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN
MONDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF JUNE 2019/3RD ASHADHA, 1941
R.P.No.390 of 2019 IN O.P.(C) No.2647/2018
(AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OP(C) 2647/2018 OF HIGH COURT)
REVIEW PETITIONER/IST PETITIONER:
GOPALAKRISHNAN, AGED 61 YEARS S/O.NARAYANAN NAIR, CHUNDAYIL HOUSE, UPPUKULAM, MANNARKAD, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.P.JAYARAM
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENT & 2ND PETITIONER:
1 GOPI, AGED 56 YEARS, S/O.KULLATH KARTHYAYANI AMMA, CHUNDAYIL HOUSE, EDATHANATTUKARA, UPPUKULAM, MANNARKAD, PALAKKAD, PIN - 678 601.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the request for expeditious disposal should have considered that the trial of the suit was stayed under Section 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
GOPALAKRISHNAN
- respondent
GOPI
- respondent
SURESH
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court