The regular first appeal, not pressed on the behalf of the appellants, was dismissed for want of urgency in pressing the said appeal. High Court
The appeal was dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MARY JOSEPH
TUESDAY, THE 01ST DAY OF OCTOBER 2019 / 9TH ASWINA, 1941
RFA.No.61 OF 2009
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT & DECREE DATED 31.05.2008 IN OS 381/2006 OF ADDITIONAL SUB COURT, IRINJALAKUDA
APPELLANTS/DEFENDANTS 1,6 AND 8:
1 P.M MUHAMMED SALIM AGED 57 YEARS S/O. PUNNILATH MOIDEEN BAVA, MANAGING PARTNER,, COCHIN BEARING CENTRE, FLAT NO.13 D, ORIENTAL GARDENS NORTH TOWER, KOCHI -682026, KERALA.
2 P.M. MUHAMMED SANIL AGED 27 YEARS S/O. P.M. MUHAMMED SALIM, REPRESENTED BY HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, P.M. MUHAMMED SALIM, AGED 57 YEARS, S/O. PUNNIATH MOIDEEN BAVA, FLAT NO.13 D, ORIENTAL GARDENS NORTH TOWER, KOCHI -682026
3 COCHIN BEARING CENTRE P.B. NO. 4206 JUDGES AVENUE, KALOOR, KOCHI-17, REP. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, P.M. MUHAMMED SALIM,AGED 57, S/O. PUNNIATH MOIDEEN BAVA, FLAT NO.13 D, ORIENTAL GARDENS NORTH TOWER, KOCHI -682026
BY ADVS. SRI.JOHN NUMPELI (JUNIOR) SRI.P.V.PAULSON
RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF&DEFENDANTS 2 TO 5 & 7:
1 RABIYA MUHAMMED, AGED 61 YEARS, S/O. NAMBEERIMADATHIL MUHAMMED, AZHIKODE DESOM, VILLAGE, KODUNGALLUR TALUK.
2 A.A. REHIM, AGED 41 YEARS S/O. ABDUL KHADER, PARTNER COCHIN BEARING CENTRE, ANDIYAKATH HOUSE, KAIPAMANGALAM VILLAGE, KODUNGALLUR TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT.
3 N.A. ABDUL RAHIM, AGED 39 PARTNER COCHIN BEARING CENTRE, S/O. NHARAKKATTIL ABDUL KHADER, KAIPAMANGALAM, VILLAGE, P.O. PERINJANAM, THRISSUR
RFA.No.61/2009 2
R1 BY ADV. SRI.JAGAN GEORGE R1 BY ADV. SRI.K.A.NOUSHAD R1 BY ADV. SRI.P.G.PRAMOD
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01.10.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
RFA.No.61/2009 3
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 1st day of October 2019
Sri. Ajith, the learned counsel representing Sri. John Numpeli (Junior), who has laid vakalath for the appellants in the case has submitted that the R.F.A is not pressed.
In view of this submission, R.F.A is dismissed as not pressed.
Sd/-
MARY JOSEPH
JUDGE
JJ/
P.M MUHAMMED SALIM AND ORS
RABIYA MUHAMMED AND ORS
MARY JOSEPH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
