A.a.Haneefa v. S.Suresh
Case brief
What is this about?
The appellant sought permission to withdraw the regular first appeal. The court granted permission. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What did the court decide?
Permission granted to withdraw the appeal; appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF AUGUST 2019 / 30TH SRAVANA, 1941
RFA.No.347 OF 2011
AGAINST THE DECREE AND JUDGMENT IN OS 143/2008 OF SUB COURT, PERUMBAVOOR
APPELLANT/DEFENDANT:
A.A.HANEEFA, S/O AYYAMMANAKUDY ALIYAR KAITHAKKATTUKARA, PATTIMATTOM VILLAGE, KUNNATHUNADU TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
BY ADVS. SRI.C.S.ABDUL SAMMAD SRI.V.D.BALAKRISHNA KARTHA
RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF:
S.SURESH, S/O A.SIVASUBRAMANIAN I/II ALWYIN NAGAR, BYE PASS ROAD, RAMANATHAPURAM P.O., COIMBATORE-45.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
A.A.HANEEFA
- respondent
S.SURESH
Coram
SATHISH NINAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court