The appeal was dismissed as not pressed by the learned counsel, who submitted that the issues between the parties were settled out of court.
None. Appeal dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MARY JOSEPH
FRIDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2019 / 19TH ASWINA, 1941
RFA.No.325 OF 2004(C)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE IN OS 120/1997 DATED 20-12-2003 OF SUB COURT, OTTAPPALAM
APPELLANT/5TH DEFENDANT:
BALAN VAIDYAR, S/O.LATE NARIKUNDIL KUNHIRAMAN VIDYAR, RESIDING AT PULAPPATTA AMSOM, OTTAPPALAM TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
BY ADVS. SMT.G.GEETHISHA SRI.T.C.SURESH MENON SMT.M.R.VALSA
RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFFS 2 TO 4/DEFENDANTS 2 TO 4 & 6 TO 9:
WIDOW OF N.GOLDEN JUBILEE @ N.C. JUBILEE, RESIDING AT PULAPPATTA AMSOM, OTTAPALAM TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
RFA.No.325 OF 2004(C) 2
R5 & R8 BY ADV.SRI.P.JAYARAM
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11.10.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
RFA.No.325 OF 2004(C) 3
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 11th day of October 2019
It is submitted by the learned counsel that the issues involved have been settled out of court among the parties and in view of that he is not pressing the matter. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
Sd/-
MARY JOSEPH
Ab
JUDGE
RFA.No.325 OF 2004(C) 4
BALAN VAIDYAR
VISWABHARATHY JUBILEE
DEEPTHI JUBILEE
DEEPA JUBILEE
UMA
MALATHI VENUGOPALAN
MARY JOSEPH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
