M.K.Prameela v. v.Padmavathi
Case brief
What is this about?
The appeal was disposed of as the parties settled their disputes amicably and filed an application to record the settlement under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC.
What did the court decide?
The appeal was disposed of based on the parties' amicable settlement filed under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN
MONDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF AUGUST 2019 / 4TH BHADRA, 1941
RFA.No.266 OF 2017
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE IN OS 285/2008 DATED 21-11-2016 OF PRINCIPAL SUB COURT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
APPELLANTS / ADDL.PLAINTIFFS 2 AND 3:
1 M.K.PRAMEELA W/O. LATE VISWAKUMAR, AGED 52, S/O. LATE CHELLAPPAN, 2/1935 CRA 201,GOWREESAPATTOM, PATTOM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
2 NISHA P.V. D/O. LATE VISWAKUMAR,DO-DO.
BY ADVS. SRI.L.MOHANAN SMT.LIGEY ANTONY
RESPONDENTS / DEFENDANTS 1 TO 4:
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M.K.PRAMEELA W/O. LATE VISWAKUMAR
- appellant
NISHA P.V. D/O. LATE VISWAKUMAR
- respondent
V.PADMAVATHI
- respondent
VISALAKSHI
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court