The First Appeal was dismissed for default as the appellant failed to appear and had not prosecuted the appeal further.
The appeal stands dismissed for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MARY JOSEPH
THURSDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2019 / 2ND KARTHIKA, 1941
RFA.No.105 OF 2008
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE IN O.S. NO.148/2002 DATED 20-06-2007 OF PRINCIPAL SUB COURT, PALAKKAD
APPELLANT IN R.F.A-PLAINTIFF IN SUIT:
M.CHANDRASEKHARAN NAIR S/O.LATE LAKSHMIKUTTY AMMA, AGED 65, CONTRACTOR, RESIDING AT "JYOTHIRAJ", SHANTI NAGAR, D.P.O. ROAD, PALAKKAD.
BY ADVS. SRI.K.JAYAKUMAR (SR.) SMT.V.DEEPA SMT.GEETHA P.MENON SRI.P.B.KRISHNAN SRI.R.SURAJ KUMAR
RESPONDENTS IN R.F.A-DEFENDANTS IN SUIT:
1 PADMINI GOPI RESIDING AT ABUDABI, U.A.E. (FAX-009712764056) W/O K.K GOPI , P.B NO 3838 ,ETISALAT,11TH FLOOR HOBABUDHABI UAE
2 K.K. GOPI RESIDING AT DO. DO. P.B NO 3838, ETISALAT 11TH FLOOR,HOB-A, ABUDHABI,UAE THE ADDRESS OF RESPONDENTS 1 AND 2 IN THE APPEAL IS CORRECTED AS ABOVE VIDE ORDER DATED 10.3.2008 IN IA 1033/2008
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 24.10.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
RFA.No.105 OF 2008
2
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 24th day of October 2019
Though specific postings have been given to see that steps are taken, the real factum was apprised to this Court. Reported from the section that steps are not taken. There was no representation for the appellant also. It seems that the appellant
is not interested in prosecuting the appeal any further.
Therefore, the appeal stands dismissed for default.
Sd/-
MARY JOSEPH
JUDGE
NAB
M.Chandrasedharan Nair
Padmini Gopi
K.K. Gopi
Mary Joseph
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
