The revision petitioner submitted that the revision petition is not pressed. The High Court of Kerala dismissed the revision petition as not pressed and dismissed all pending interlocutory applications.
Revision petition dismissed as not pressed; interlocutory applications dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.HARIPRASAD
&
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHIRCY V.
FRIDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF JULY 2019 / 21ST ASHADHA, 1941
RCRev..No.154 of 2018
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN RCA 69/2016 DATED 29-11-2017 of RENT CONTROL APPELLATE AUTHORITY/II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, KOZHIKODE.
AGAINST THE ORDER IN RCP 57/2014 DATED 16-12-2015 of ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I ,KOZHIKODE.
REVISION PETITIONER/RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT :
SINDHU T.K, AGED 38 YEARS, W/O. SUJITH, PARAYIL HOUSE, ERANHIPALAM (P.O), KATCHERI AMSOM, DESOM, KOZHIKODE TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT - PIN 673 006.
BY ADVS.SRI.R.BINDU (SASTHAMANGALAM) & SRI.PRASANTH M.P
RESPONDENTS/APPELLANTS/PETITIONERS :
BY ADVS.SRI.P.A.HARISH & SRI.V.V.SURENDRAN.
THIS RENT CONTROL REVISION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 12.07.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
RCR No.154 of 2018 2
A.HARIPRASAD & SHIRCY.V, J J.
R.C.R No.154 of 2018
Dated this the 12th day of July, 2019
O R D E R
A.HARIPRASAD, J
Learned counsel for the revision petitioner submitted that the
revision petition is not pressed. Hence, it is dismissed as not pressed.
All pending interlocutory applications will stand dismissed.
A. HARIPRASAD,
JUDGE.
SHIRCY.V, JUDGE
amk
Sindu T.K
Kunnath Abdulla Muhammed
Kunnath Moideen
A.Hariprasad
Shircy.V
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
