Jalaludeen v. M S Shan
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court, supervising the Wakf Tribunal under Article 227, directed the Tribunal to dispose of pending enquiry petition EP 1/2016 within three months due to a lapse of over three years. The current petition was dismissed accordingly.
What did the court decide?
Direction to the Wakf Tribunal to dispose of EP 1/2016 within three months from receipt of judgment copy.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL
&
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANNIE JOHN
TUESDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF JANUARY 2019 / 9TH MAGHA, 1940
OP (WAKF).No. 3 of 2019
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OS 9/2014 of WAKF TRIBUNAL, KOLLAM DATED 01-10-2015
PETITIONER:
JALALUDHEEN AGED 51 YEARS S/O HAJI MUHAMMED HANEEFA, MUSHTHAK MANZIL,
KUTTMALA, VAZHICHAL VILLAGE TRIVANDRUM.
BY ADV. SRI.M.R.SARIN
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Wakf Tribunal should be directed to dispose of pending enquiry petition EP 1/2016 within a time frame due to inordinate delay.
Whether the current High Court petition is maintainable under Article 227 of the Constitution to expedite disposal of the pending matter.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
JALALUDHEEN
- respondent
M S SHAN
- respondent
MAHIMKUTTY
- respondent
JALAL
- respondent
SULFIKER
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court