Manju v. Sukumari
Case brief
What is this about?
Since OP(MAC) No.73 of 2018 set aside the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal order limiting relief for a mentally challenged minor's education needs and remitted the matter for reconsideration under Kerala State Road Transport Corporation principles, taking over two months.
What did the court decide?
Order dated 23-05-2018 setting aside to the extent of limiting disbursement to Rs.30,000; Tribunal directed to reconsider within two months.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN
TUESDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF JUNE 2019 / 28TH JYAISHTA, 1941
OP (MAC).No.73 of 2018
AGAINST THE ORDER IN I.A.No.3651/2018 IN OP(MV)No. 263/2013 of MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL ,ATTINGAL DATED 23-05-2018
PETITIONERS:
- 1 MANJU, W/O.JAYALAL, AJESH NIVAS, AYILAM MUDAKKAL VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
- 2 AMAL, S/O.JAYALAL, AJESH NIVAS, AYILAM, MUDAKKAL VILLAGE,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
- 3 AJESHLAL, AGED 18 YEARS, S/O.JAYALAL, AJESH NIVAS, AYILAM MUDAKKAL VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. MENTALLY CHALLENGED PERSON, REPRESENTED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER-HIS MOTHER MANJU, AGED 37 YEARS, W/O.JAYALAL, AJESH NIVAS, AYILAM MUDAKKAL VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM AS HIS NEXT FRIEND.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether any interference is warranted on the Tribunal's order limiting the release of compensation to Rs.30,000/- for a mentally challenged minor.
Whether the Tribunal applied its mind to the circumstances of the claimant who is a student in a State Institute for mentally challenged persons.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
MANJU
- petitioner
AMAL
- petitioner
AJESHLAL
- respondent
SUKUMARI
- respondent
MANIKANTAN
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court