Mammad v. U.Sarin
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought quashing of an order denying release of compensation amount held in fixed deposit for a minor. Petitioner later withdrew the original writ petition, which was dismissed.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN
MONDAY, THE 01ST DAY OF JULY 2019 / 10TH ASHADHA, 1941
OP (MAC).No.64 of 2019
AGAINST THE ORDER IN I.A 524/2019 IN OPMV 593/2015 of MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL TIRUR DATED 12-03-2019
PETITIONER:
MAMMAD,
AGED 74 YEARS, S/O. IMBICHIMOYI, PUTHIYA PARAMBIL HOUSE, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN 673 635
BY ADV. SRI.C.M.MOHAMMED IQUABAL
RESPONDENTS:
1 U.SARIN, S/O. RAJAN U, UMMOLI HOUSE, KOTTAPARAMBA, KOZHIKODE 673 008
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mammad
- respondent
U. Sarin
- respondent
Sreelatha P.S
- respondent
Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court