Sijo Manila v. Riya
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought to set aside Family Court interim order awarding maintenance based on finding he runs medical shops. High Court set aside order and remitted matter to Family Court for fresh consideration after hearing both sides.
What did the court decide?
PEX-4 order of Family Court set aside; matter remitted to Family Court for assessment within 3-4 weeks after hearing both sides.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS
FRIDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF NOVEMBER 2019 / 1ST AGRAHAYANA, 1941
OP(Crl.).No.351 OF 2019
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN MC 566/2018 OF FAMILY COURT, THRISSUR
PETITIONER/S:
SIJO MANILA, AGED 34 YEARS S/O. C.J. PAUL, CHIRAYATH MANJILA HOUSE, KIZHAKKUMPATTUMKARA, EAST FORTE P.O, THRISSUR.
BY ADVS. SRI.T.K.VIPINDAS SRI.K.V.SREE VINAYAKAN SRI.K.M.MUHAMMED HUSSAIN
RESPONDENT/S:
RIYA, AGED 29 YEARS, D/O. JOY, THANIKKAL KODANKANDATH HOUSE, OLLUR P.O, THRISSUR.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether theFamily Court's finding that the petitioner is running two medical shops is factually wrong and requires interdiction
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sijo Manila
- respondent
Riya
Coram
Alexander Thomas
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court