Renju Francis v. the State Transport Appellate Tribunal
Case brief
What is this about?
This writ petition was closed by directing the Regional Transport Authority to decide the pending appeal (MVARP 142/2016) after affording reasonable hearing to affected parties.
What did the court decide?
Original Petition closed with direction to RTA to decide MVARP No. 142/2016 after hearing.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR
TUESDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2019 / 21ST KARTHIKA, 1941
OP(C).No.996 OF 2019
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN MVARP 142/2016 DATED 08-112018 OF S.T.A.TRIBUNAL,ERNAKULAM
PETITIONER/S:
- 1 RENJU FRANCIS,AGED 39 YEARS PAPPALI HOUSE, ERUMATHALA P.O, KEEZHMAD, ALUVA.
- 2 NAZEER K.M.,KARIPPAI HOUSE, THAIKKATTUKARA P.O, ALUVA.
BY ADV. SRI.I.DINESH MENON
RESPONDENT/S:
- 1 THE STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present Original Petition should be closed by directing the Respondent Transport Authority to dispose of the pending appeal?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
RENJU FRANCIS
- petitioner
NAZEER K.M.
- respondent
THE STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
- respondent
THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY ERNAKULAM
- respondent
EMIL B.
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court