Boby Jose, v. Jose Thomas
Case brief
What is this about?
Petition against order allowing plaintiff's replication without prior plea. Court found no jurisdiction error in granting leave and dismissed original petition.
What did the court decide?
Original petition dismissed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF JANUARY 2019/10TH MAGHA, 1940
O.P.(C)No.307 of 2019
(AGAINST THE ORDER IN I.A.No.740/2018 IN O.S.No.150/2016 OF MUNSIFF COURT, PALA)
PETITIONERS:
1 BOBY JOSE, AGED 40 YEARS, S/O JOSE, THOPPIL HOUSE, VELLAPPADU KARA, PALAI POST, KOTTAYAM-686 575.
2 LISHA BOBY, AGED 37 YEARS, D/O JOSE, THOPPIL HOUSE, VELLAPPADU KARA, LALAM VILALGE, KOTTAYAM-686 575.
BY ADV. JOSEPH T JOHN
RESPONDENTS:
1 JOSE THOMAS, S/O THOMAS, THOPPIL HOUSE, VELLAPPADU KARA, PALAI POST, KOTTAYAM-686 575.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere when notice of leave of court to file replication was filed subsequent to the filing of replication
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
BOBY JOSE
- petitioner
LISHA BOBY
- respondent
JOSE THOMAS
- respondent
THRESSIYAMMA
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court