Thampi v. Ashraf
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala directed the lower court to issue certified copies of photostat documents produced by the plaintiff along with the plaint, with a specific endorsement stating that the certified copies are only copies of the original photostats.
What did the court decide?
Directed the court below to issue certified copies of the documents with an endorsement stating they are copies of photostat copies.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN
FRIDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF JANUARY 2019/28TH POUSHA, 1940
O.P.(C)No.188 of 2019
(AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN O.S.No.26/2017 OF SUB COURT, MUVATTUPUZHA)
PETITIONER/DEFENDANT:
THAMPI, AGED 50 YEARS, S/O.ANANDAN, ANIMOOTIL HOUSE, MUKKUDI KARA, KANTHIPPARA VILLAGE, UDUMBANCHOLA TALUK, IDUKKI DISTRICT, NOW RESIDING AT SREE VINAYAKA TIMBERS, DOOR NO.2/77/30-A/3, JNANAGURSWAMI MILL STREET, PATTIVEERANPATTI KARA, SEVUKAMPATTI VILLAGE, NILAKKOTTA TALUK, DINDUKKAL DISTRICT, TAMIL NADU.
BY ADVS. SRI.ALEX.M.SCARIA SMT.NISNA K.MUHAMMED SMT.SARITHA THOMAS SRI.G.BAIJURAJ
RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF:
ASHRAF, AGED 52 YEARS, S/O.MUHAMMED, MANGALASSEY HOUSE, ELEMBRA KARA, ERAMALLOOR VILLAGE, KOTHAMANGALAM TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to request certified copies of photostat documents produced by the plaintiff along with the plaint.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
THAMPI
- respondent
ASHRAF
Coram
SATHISH NINAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court