Shaiju Thomas v. Shaji
Case brief
What is this about?
This order dismisses the original petition regarding excessive delay in the Sub Court, Neyyattinkara, without issuing notice to respondents and instead directs the subordinate court to dispose of the pending appeals by the specified date.
What did the court decide?
Direction to the Court below to take up and dispose of A.S.Nos.25/2017 and 35/2017 on or before 29.02.2020.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL THOMAS
TUESDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF JULY 2019 / 25TH ASHADHA, 1941
OP(C).No.1638 of 2019
AS NOS.25 OF 2017 AND 35 OF 2017 of SUB COURT,NEYYATTINKARA
PETITIONER:
SHAIJU THOMAS, AGED 29 YEARS, S/O. THOMAS, SHINE BHAVAN, KOTTUKONAM, ATHIYANNOOR DESOM, ATHIYANNOOR VILLAGE.
BY ADV. SRI.R.GOPAN
RESPONDENTS:
1 SHAJI, S/O. SAMIYEL, CHERUVERACKAL VEEDU, KOTTUKONAM, ATHIYANNOOR DESOM, ATHIYANNOOR VILLAGE, PIN - 695001
2 SAJI, S/O. SHAJI, CHERUVARACKAL VEEDU, KOTTUKONAM, ATHIYANNOOR DESOM, AHITYANNOOR VILLAGE,PIN - 695001
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's cause for delay in disposing of two appeals is sustainable and deserves a mandamus directive.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Shaiju Thomas
- respondent
Shaji
- respondent
Saji
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court