Muhammed Azeem v. Thahira
Case brief
What is this about?
In a matrimonial appeal, the High Court of Kerala dismissed the matter as settled between the parties without recording a substantive judgment on the merits.
What did the court decide?
The matrimonial appeal is dismissed as settled between the parties.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE
&
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANIL KUMAR
MONDAY, THE 02ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2019 / 11TH BHADRA, 1941
Mat.Appeal.No.374 OF 2012
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OP 60/2010 DATED 31-03-2012 OF FAMILY COURT, THIRUVALLA
APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS:
1 MUHAMMED AZEEM
AGED 29, S/O.ABDUL RASHEED RAWTHER, ULAYAMADATHIL PUTHU VEEDU, THONNALLOOR MURI, PANDALAM VILLAGE, ADOOR TALUK, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT, PIN-689501.
2 ABDUL RASHEED RAWTHER AGED 62, R/AT ULAYAMADATHIL PUTHU VEEDU, THONNALLOOR MURI, PANDALAM VILLAGE, ADOOR TALUK, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT, PIN-689501.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
MUHAMMED AZEEM
- appellant
ABDUL RASHEED RAWTHER
- appellant
RAMEENA BEEGAM
- respondent
THAHIRA
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court