Sheeja v. Shine
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court allowed an application to include a Memorandum of Agreement reached through mediation. Both matrimonial appeals were disposed of in the light of the settlement agreement between the parties, which was made part of the judgment.
What did the court decide?
Memorandum of Agreement (Annexure R1(a)) admitted; both matrimonial appeals disposed of based on the settlement.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE
&
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANIL KUMAR
WEDNESDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF JUNE 2019 / 22ND JYAISHTA, 1941
Mat.Appeal.No.482 of 2011
[AGAINST THE ORDER IN O.P(G&W)No. 214/2009 of FAMILY COURT, THODUPUZHA DATED 17-12-2010]
APPELLANT/PETITIONER:
SHEEJA, AGED 31 YEARS, D/O KARUNAKARAN, MEPPUTHUSERRIL, CHITHIRAPURAM P.O.,ANACHAL, IDUKKI DISTRICT, PIN-685565
BY ADVS. SRI.P.VIJAYAKUMAR SRI.B.HARRYLAL SRI.C.R.REGHUNATHAN SRI.M.V.ASHIM
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT:
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to admit an additional Memorandum of Agreement executed via mediation as part of the judgment record.
Whether to dispose of matrimonial appeals based on the settlement agreement between the parties.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
SHEEJA
- respondent
SHINE
- respondent
KRISHNAN
- respondent
VILASINI
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court