The High Court of Kerala dismissed a criminal revision petition filed by a bank. The court held that the accused, who had been acquitted in the underlying case, had died two months prior.
Discretional revision petition dismissed as the accused was acquitted and died.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.M.BABU
THURSDAY, THE 03RD DAY OF OCTOBER 2019 / 11TH ASWINA, 1941
Crl.Rev.Pet.No.877 OF 2008
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CC 436/2007 DATED 17-12-2007 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS ,ERATTUPETTA
REVISION PETITIONER/S:
STATE BANK OF TRAVANCORE, PLASSANAL BRANCH, ERATTUPETTA, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT,, REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER, C.SAIDUTTY.
BY ADV. SRI.SUJITH MATHEW JOSE
RESPONDENT/S:
1 T.K.HAMSA HAJI THOONGANPARAMBIL HOUSE, THEKKEKARA KARA,, ERATTUPETTA VILLAGE, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT, RAVUTHAR COMPLEX NO.102, C/O. KABEER,, KINATTUMMOOTTIL, ERATTUPETTA P.O., KOTTAYAM DIST.
2 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA.
R1 BY ADV. SRI.PEER MOHD KHAN R1 BY ADV. SRI.H.HAMZA RAWTHER R1 BY ADV. SRI.B.HARIDAS
OTHER PRESENT:
R2 SRI.C.K.PRASAD-Public prosecutor
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03.10.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
2
Crl.Rev.Pet.No.877 OF 2008
ORDER
The learned counsel for the first respondent submits that the first respondent who was the accused and who was acquitted died two months ago. The submission is recorded. Since the accused who was acquitted died, the revision is dismissed.
Sd/-
A.M.BABU
JUDGE
Sks/3.10.2019
T.K. Hamsa
State of Kerala
A.M. Babu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
